America’s Cult of Ignorance Is No Match for Asia’s Cult of Intelligence

22/06/2014

A sad nešto pomalo drukčije: vrijeme je za retrospekciju i analizu. U tekstu koji prenosimo u mnogim se pasusima riječ “Amerika” može zamijeniti rječju “Hrvatska”, ali čak i bez toga, daje se zanimljiv pogled na američki, ali i uopće zapadne obrazovne sustave i mentalne sklopove i ukazuje na neke probleme kojima bi trebalo pokloniti pažnju. Naravno, ako vam je stalo do dugoročne dobrobiti nacije, a ne za vlastitu fotelju ovom mandatu.

America’s Cult of Ignorance Is No Match for Asia’s Cult of Intelligence

I have been traveling to East Asia (and many other parts of the world) for more than 25 years and over that time one of the things that has always struck me is how intelligent the general public in countries like Japan appear to be. It’s not that there aren’t dummies in East Asia, but it always seems that the average level of education and ability to think about the world intelligently and critically is impressively widespread. I’ve often thought about why this is the case and also why the same seems more difficult to say about the U.S. The answer, I think, can be found in a comment science fiction writer Isaac Asimov made about the U.S. while being interviewed in the 1980s: “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”

Asimov is right on the mark, and this cult of ignorance is the most serious national security issue facing the U.S. today. It is more important than the external threats from terrorists or the rise of a politically and economically powerful China. And a major part of the reason it is such an major issue for Americans to fix is that our immediate competitors, particularly those in Asia, have managed to create a culture in which rather than a cult of ignorance, a cult of intelligence plays a major role in shaping attitudes about the world and, thus, policies about dealing with other countries.

Many Americans are aware that the U.S. does not score well on measures such as international student assessment tests when compared to other industrial countries. For example, the 2011 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TMISS) the top five countries for math were Singapore, South Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Japan—the U.S. is not in the top ten. It is better by 8th grade, where the same counties are in the top five (although the order changes) and the U.S. makes number 9. Roughly the same pattern can bee seen for science results. This doesn’t seem too bad, but in a different testing organization’s measure, the Programme for International Student Assessment, the U.S. does not fare quite so well, scoring 36th for math, 28th for science, and 24th for reading. With the exception of science, where Finland is ranked 5th, all of the top five countries in this measure are from East Asia.

American policy has generally worked from the assumption that the problem lies in basic weaknesses in the structure of our educational system with its inherent inequalities and the way in which our school curricula are constructed. These certainly have contributed to comparatively weak scores. I have long been convinced that one of the reasons Japan’s educational system is better than the U.S.—at least in the sense that a very broad swath of the general public receives a good and equal education through high school—is related to funding. The U.S. system generates inherent inequalities in school funding by depending upon property taxes. Even in states where there is some (usually grudging) redistribution of wealth to support public schools in poor areas (in Texas it is called the Robin Hood law), it is obvious that children in wealthy areas receive a better education with far greater academic and other resources than those in poorer areas. In Japan, because there is a national curriculum and a significant portion of the funding for public schools comes from the national government, in addition to funding from prefectural and municipal governments, there is considerably less inequality in distribution of and access to quality education than in the U.S.

Unfortunately, the troubles with the U.S. education system are much deeper than distribution of funding or curriculum weaknesses, although these are both a byproduct of the cultural issue that Asimov observes. The troubles lie in the cult of ignorance and anti-intellectualism that has been a long-standing part of American society and which has become increasingly evident and powerful in recent years through the propagandizing and proselytizing of groups like the Tea Party and the religious right.

The fundamental reason that countries in places like East Asia present such a significant challenge to the U.S. politically and economically is not because they have a lot of people or big militaries, or seem to be willing to grow their economic and political might without concern for issues like damage to the environment (China). The problem is that these countries have core cultural values that are more akin to a cult of intelligence and education than a cult of ignorance and anti-intellectualism. In Japan, for example, teachers are held in high esteem and normally viewed as among the most important members of a community. I have never run across the type of suspicion and even disdain for the work of teachers that occurs in the U.S. Teachers in Japan typically are paid significantly more than their peers in the U.S. The profession of teaching is one that is seen as being of central value in Japanese society and those who choose that profession are well compensated in terms of salary, pension, and respect for their knowledge and their efforts on behalf of children.

In addition, we do not see in Japan significant numbers of the types of religious schools that are designed to shield children from knowledge about basic tenets of science and accepted understandings of history—such as evolutionary theory or the religious views of the Founding Fathers, who were largely deists—which are essential to having a fundamental understanding of the world. The reason for this is because in general Japanese value education, value the work of intellectuals, and see a well-educated public with a basic common knowledge in areas of scientific fact, math, history, literature, etc. as being an essential foundation to a successful democracy.

Americans need to recognize that if the cult of ignorance continues, it will become increasingly difficult to compete politically and economically with countries that highly value intelligence and learning. Nowhere is this more problematic in the U.S. than among a growing number of elected officials who are products of that cult of ignorance and who, thus, are not equipped to compete with their international peers. Why is this a problem of national security? Because a population and its leadership need to have the knowledge and intellectual skills necessary to analyze world affairs in an intelligent and sophisticated way and to elect intelligent, capable representatives. The problem is not really with our educational system; it is with our educational culture. Americans need to remember the words of Thomas Jefferson, who wrote to Charles Yancey on January 6, 1816: “”if a nation expects to be ignorant & free, in a state of civilisation, it expects what never was & never will be.”

John W. Traphagan is Professor of Religious Studies and faculty affiliate of the Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin.

3 Responses to America’s Cult of Ignorance Is No Match for Asia’s Cult of Intelligence

  1. Zanzibar on 22/06/2014 at 12:46

    Iste brige vode i Ameriku, a da učimo od boljih? Put je tu. Ako već imamo rezultate da promislimo o njima. što činiti? Mijenjati nešto ili opet tupiti po starom?

    Kad smo kod Thomasa Jeffersona koji je rekao: “Ništa ne može spriječiti čovjeka s ispravnim mentalnim stavom da postigne svoj cilj. I ništa na ovom svijetu ne može pomoći čovjeku s krivim stavom”.

  2. ana on 22/06/2014 at 17:51

    Evo nama najzanimljivijih dijelova na hrvatskom.
    Prvi odlomak:
    Putujem istočnom Azijom (i mnogim drugim dijelovima svijeta) već više d 25 godina i tijekom tog vremena jedna od stvari koje su me uvijek iznenađivale jest kako se inteligentno doima običan puk u zemljama poput Japana. Nije da u istočnoj Aziji nema bedaka, ali uvijek izgleda da je prosječna razina obrazovanosti i sposobnosti da se misli o svijetu inteligentno i kritički impresivno široko rasprostranjena. Često razmišljam zbog čega je to tako te zašto je istu stvar naizgled teško reći za SAD. Odgovor, čini mi se, leži u komentaru koji je znanstvenofantastični pisac Isaac Asimov dao o SAD-u prilikom jednog intervjua 1980-tih: “U SAD-u postoji kult neznanja i oduvijek je tu. Crta antiintelektualizma je trajna nit koja se uvija kroz naš politički i kulturni život, hranjena krivom zamisli da demokracija znači da je moje neznanje jednako dobro kao i tvoje znanje.”
    Odlomak o obrazovanju:
    Nažalost, nevolja obrazovnog sustava SAD-a je mnogo ozbiljnija od distribucije sredstava ili slabosti kurikuluma, iako su oboje nusprodukti pitanja kulture kojeg Asimov spominje. Nevolja je u kultu neznanja i antiintelektualizma koji je dugovječan dio američkog društva i koji postaje sve očitiji i jači posljednjih godina kroz propagandu i prozelitizam skupina poput republikanske Tea Party i religiozne desnice.
    Temeljni razlog zbog kojeg zemlje na prostoru poput istočne Azije predstavljaju tako značajan politički i ekonomski izazov nije to što imaju mnogo stanovnika ili goleme armije ili to što su očito voljne graditi svoju ekonomsku i političku moć bez obzira na ekološko onečišćenje (Kina). Problem je u tome što te zemlje imaju temeljne kulturne vrijednosti koje su bliže kultu inteligencije i obrazovanja nego li kultu neznanja i antiintelektualizma. U Japanu, primjerice, učitelje se visoko cijeni i uobičajeno gleda kao na jedne od najvažnijih članova zajednice. Nikad nisam naišao na vrst sumnjičavosti pa čak i prezira prema radu učitelja kakva se pojavljuje u SAD-u. Učitelji u Japanu su tipično plaćeni značajno više nego li njihove kolege u SAD-u. Učiteljska profesija se doživljava kao središnja vrijednost japanskog društva i oni koji se odluče za tu profesiju dobiju dobru naknadu u smislu plaće, mirovine i poštovanja za svoje znanje i svoje napore za rad s djecom.
    Pored toga, u Japanu ne vidimo značajan broj raznih vrsta religijskih škola koje su dizajnirane da zaštite djecu od znanja o osnovnim postavkama znanosti i prihvaćenih tumačenja prošlosti – poput teorije o evoluciji ili religioznih stavova Očeva osnivača SAD-a, koji su većinom bili deisti- što je esencijalno za osnovno razumijevanje svijeta. Razlog leži u tome što Japanci općenito cijene obrazovanje, cijene rad intelektualaca te u dobro obrazovanoj općoj populaciji, s osnovnim općepoznatim znanjem u područjima znanstvenih činjenica, matematike, povijesti, književnosti, itd., vide najvažnije svojstvo na kojem se temelji uspješna deomkracija.
    Autor: John W. Traphagan je profesor religijskih znanosti i vanjski suradnik Centra za istraživanje stanovništva Sveučilišta u Teksasu, Austin.

  3. žukov1943. on 03/07/2014 at 16:13

    Jao svijetu koji vodi država poput SAD – a!




Osobne stranice s nastavnim sadržajima

  • Antonija Horvatek (matematika)
  • Josip Kličinović (matematika)
  • Saša Peričak (biologija)
  • Dalibor Perković (fizika)
  • Anita Damjanović (engleski)
  • Marijan Biruš (geografija)
  • Nedeljko Begović (fizika)
  • Aleksandra - Maria Vuković (matematika)
  • Miran Novokmet (Računovodstvo - Knjigovodstvo)
  • Antonija Sikavica Joler ("Hrvatski na mreži")
  • Dalibor Joler ("Deutsche Seiten")
  • Željana Mateljan (matematika)
  • Nina Obradović (fizika)
  • Mislav Kolić (povijest)
  • Ivana Šovagović (matematika)
  • Zoran Hercigonja (programiranje, Python)
    Ukoliko znate za još neke nastavnike koji imaju ovakve stranice, javite nam!
  • Sindikati

    Institucije

    Categories

    Banneri

    (225x25) (213x44) (180x156, prozirni) (180x156, bijeli)

    Kolumne